Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6502VJ
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 16:12
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 210
2-Core 387
116% 224 Pts
4-Core 706
8-Core 1,192
115% 949 Pts
64-Core 1,874
116% 1,874 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 3158) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 73
Parallax 73.4
61% 73.6 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 55.5
46% 55.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZ 1TB
775GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,200
Write 1,439
Mixed 1,240
359% 1,626 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 83.7
278% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 865
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 563
436% 609 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 59.8
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 51.1
154% 54 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 28.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 141%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4180
Typical ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback