Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-885

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-885  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-885(DCH)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 05 '24 at 21:41
Run Duration664 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 243
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 644
71% 561 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.6% Below average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 44.8
42% 50.2 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 40.5
34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 261 259 260 261 260 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 853
Write 819
Mixed 754
SusWrite 304
153% 682 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 41.9
145% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 580
459% 638 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
379GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 68 69 69 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 61.6
Write 61.1
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 68.3
73% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 32%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
5GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 35
Write 19.4
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 20
31% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2
137% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 12.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 9 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC156 PHL 273V7
Typical Aspire TC-885 Builds (Compare 1,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-885

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback