Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82MF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82MF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 11:35
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 154
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 724
62% 529 Pts
64-Core 1,109
69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.56
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
9.93% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 27.9
7% 17.9 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 21.1
16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-4D512-Q62 512GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1U262
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,934
Write 1,329
Mixed 1,269
334% 1,510 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 26.9
110% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 645
466% 612 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC8T1-B8DS HT Micron HTH5AN8G6NDJR-XND 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 51 60 15.5" 1536 793 AUO369F
Typical 82MF Builds (Compare 250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback