Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 67% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 154 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 724 62% 529 Pts	64-Core 1,109 69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 36,301 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.56 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	9.93% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 27.9 7% 17.9 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 23.2 Splatting 21.1 16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.93% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-4D512-Q62 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1U262 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,934 Write 1,329 Mixed 1,269 334% 1,510 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 26.9 110% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 758 DQ Write 432 DQ Mixed 645 466% 612 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 250%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AL1P32NC8T1-B8DS HT Micron HTH5AN8G6NDJR-XND 12GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 13.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	63	51	60	15.5"	1536 793	AUO369F

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 12%, 36,301 samples	242x

SSD
CL1-4D256 256GBSsstcBench 118%, 2,132 samples	165x
IM2P33F4 256GBNvmeBench 136%, 233 samples	15x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	14x

RAM
Brazil SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG Brazil 8GBSmartBench 67%, 147 samples	73x
Brazil SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG Adata 4JQA-0622AC 8GBSmartBench 65%, 50 samples	22x
AD4S3200J4G22-B Smart Brazil 8GBAdataBench 66%, 50 samples	21x