Asrock B550M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B550M-C  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 06:20
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 842
84% 683 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$220
PNY(196E 1397) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 84
Parallax 89.3
84% 92 fps
MRender 86.4
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 64.3
60% 74.2 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711250WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 415 193 217 124 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,187
Write 1,758
Mixed 1,611
SusWrite 328
276% 1,221 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 76
271% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 633
DQ Mixed 854
633% 847 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 189%
Great: 296%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 240GB
190GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 6.4 51 5.2 35 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 385
Write 361
Mixed 299
SusWrite 43.4
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 20.2
83% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 76.3
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 0.2
36% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.6% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2720 VG278
Typical B550M-C Builds (Compare 1,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback