HP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8597
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 09:49
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 275
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 1,019
94% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8597) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C900 M.2 2280 NVMe 1TB SSD
916GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0808A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 822 828 806 798 799 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1569
Write 1,375
Mixed 962
SusWrite 810
264% 1,179 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 20.3
108% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 23.2
DQ Mixed 43.2
89% 196 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 156%
Great: 294%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical ProDesk 600 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback