Today's hottest deals

Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 17:11
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$230
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 276
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 963
89% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,483
92% 1,483 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 248
Parallax 318
220% 279 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 225
Splatting 168
184% 234 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 187%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force TM8FP8001T 1TB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 827 1063 784 218 433 232 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,556
Write 1,016
Mixed 952
SusWrite 593
229% 1,029 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.1
165% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 433
362% 511 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 174%
Great: 285%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112
191GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 286 82 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 361
Write 182
Mixed 348
SusWrite 158
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 46.2
152% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 243
183% 245 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Chun Well Holding Limited ND4U0832162BRQDE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.4% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 17.2" 1280 720 GWD0173 ARZOPA
Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback