Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory118.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230407
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 00:26
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 920
81% 691 Pts
64-Core 2411
149% 2411 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4051) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 4050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 181
Parallax 166
143% 174 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 139
Splatting 125
123% 155 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 499GB
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 109 107 104 109 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 103
Mixed 132
SusWrite 110
85% 402 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 18
68% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 73.6
DQ Mixed 165
152% 247 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 308%
Amd-raid GIGABYTE GP-AG41 1TB
832GB free
Firmware: EGFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 102 132 133 127 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 497
Write 526
Mixed 505
SusWrite 128
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 4.7
24% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 783
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 734
548% 728 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 381%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 128GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
151% Outstanding
MC Read 61.8
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 57.7
172% 60.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 23.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 60 24" 1280 720 GSM5B72 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback