ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-T8D
Memory	56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221219
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '24 at 16:58
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3 42 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 69.4 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 156 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 583 51% 434 Pts	64-Core 2,390 148% 2,390 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 2302) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 2150 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.1% Above average	Lighting 63.8 Reflection 58.5 Parallax 82.7 52% 68.3 fps	MRender 62.7 Gravity 71 Splatting 42.2 46% 58.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CE480T5D10A-256 256GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.4.7.23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 236 138 234 125 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 712 Write 328 Mixed 333 SusWrite 198 87% 393 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 30.8 118% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 418 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 175 166% 267 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 230%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 151 156 155 154 155 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Read 157 Write 118 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 154 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 114%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$88 6,631 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.12B.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 131 134 132 137 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 131 Write 79.7 Mixed 84 SusWrite 132 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-YK0 4x16GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 18.1 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 17.1 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	23.8"	1280 720	VSC3A3A VX2405-P-mhd

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback