Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513EAN
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210531
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 22:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 155
2-Core 302
93% 176 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 615
66% 527 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 22.5
16% 22 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 2.7
11% 15.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 894 872 909 927 314 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 914
Mixed 844
SusWrite 674
212% 953 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 77.1
276% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 342
326% 493 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 207%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.5
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 17.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4161
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA Builds (Compare 1,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback