Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240104
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 01 '24 at 15:40
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 31.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 214
64% 124 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 433
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3812) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.20.24.03
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 29.9
15% 18.8 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 31.2
18% 20.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQE-2T00 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 426 589 445 1220 1425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 2,004
Write 1,976
Mixed 1,659
SusWrite 755
358% 1,599 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 40.2
138% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 264
202% 281 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 182%
Great: 541%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL3L30CM-BGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 34.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 19.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 16 144 31.5" 1280 720 LEN0001 Go Display
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback