Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_F1605ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_F1605ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1605ZA
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230817
Uptime7 Days
Run DateMar 04 '24 at 20:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 136
48% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 306
28% 233 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 13E3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 25
Parallax 25
17% 23.7 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 13.9
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme EM280512GTTCB5-E19TAS 512GB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM60.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 310 238 242 296 239 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 436
Write 594
Mixed 486
SusWrite 277
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 10.8
58% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 258
191% 256 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 175%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 29.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 16" 1280 720 CMN1618
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_F1605ZA Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605ZA_F1605ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback