HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C40
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230829
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 10 '24 at 11:06
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 41
1-Core 120
2-Core 223
66% 128 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 745
69% 578 Pts
64-Core 1,477
91% 1,477 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
HP(103C 8C40) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5176
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.6% Good
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 102
Parallax 80.1
61% 85.6 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 73.1
72% 90.5 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HDJD-00BH1 512GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2NGXK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1043 1148 867 823 1049 1008 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 756
Write 800
Mixed 720
SusWrite 990
185% 816 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 33
125% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 557
388% 497 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 150%
Great: 382%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44CB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 0P 5R 10G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 56% 34 214 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx Builds (Compare 836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fa1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback