Gigabyte GA-A620M GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 211%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A620M GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '24 at 21:43
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$190
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 191
2-Core 386
114% 219 Pts
4-Core 725
8-Core 1,106
113% 916 Pts
64-Core 1,432
89% 1,432 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 107%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
PowerColor(148C 2427) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Lighting 267
Reflection 272
Parallax 510
218% 349 fps
MRender 334
Gravity 292
Splatting 281
245% 303 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 202%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gen4 1TB 1TB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VF001C27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 114 93 72 118 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 769
Write 1,540
Mixed 361
SusWrite 113
157% 696 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 25.5
72% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 134
202% 377 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 496%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-4800 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 42.6
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 46.8
SC Write 52.7
SC Mixed 49.7
142% 49.7 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 31 60 27" 1280 720 HKC2736 27E6QC
Typical GA-A620M GAMING X Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 189%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A620M GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback