Lenovo 81S9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81S9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 01:28
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 4205U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 44
2-Core 74.8
39% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 74.1
8-Core 75.1
10% 74.6 Pts
64-Core 75
5% 75 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PCH-RVR-256 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 435 368 289 235 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 905
Write 705
Mixed 615
SusWrite 342
143% 642 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 17.5
101% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 197
151% 205 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 187%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
302GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 83 92 85 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 110
Write 37.5
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 86.7
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 4 60 15.5" 1366 705 AUO81EC
Typical 81S9 Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81S9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback