Asus Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE  (all builds)
Memory120.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 14:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 204
2-Core 409
119% 231 Pts
4-Core 752
8-Core 1,496
133% 1,124 Pts
64-Core 6,768
419% 6,768 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 110%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 59
Parallax 47.1
41% 52 fps
MRender 47.1
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 56.6
43% 51.3 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4395 4412 4409 4420 3707 1068 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560R32-16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
607% Outstanding
MC Read 257
MC Write 229
MC Mixed 281
730% 255 GB/s
SC Read 42.6
SC Write 77.6
SC Mixed 62.1
174% 60.8 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 171%
This bench: 607%
Great: 607%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 35% 17 211 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA114 DELL P2219H
Typical Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 393%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 613%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,665
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback