Today's hottest deals

Geekom XT12 Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGeekom XT12 Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault XT12 Pro
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 17:23
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 55
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
92% 180 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 500
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 28.8
19% 27.4 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 0.1
15% 20.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK7N.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1938 2649 2915 2538 245 444 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 1,805
Write 2,922
Mixed 1867
SusWrite 1788
475% 2,096 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 335
4K Mixed 92.4
377% 160 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 1,143
DQ Mixed 969
722% 940 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 337%
Great: 337%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
452GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 373 391 383 364 351 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 420
Write 398
Mixed 395
SusWrite 375
90% 397 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 31.6
103% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 142
109% 147 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4S16G32C22ST 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 32.5
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 23.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 144 24" 1920 1080 VSC1B35 XG2402 SERIES
Typical XT12 Pro Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Geekom XT12 Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback