Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 19:31
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 468
61% 457 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.68% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 8.4
6% 7.43 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 11.8
8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.68%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 3060-$226
CLim: 2182 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 147
Parallax 126
108% 135 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 101
Splatting 89.3
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,790
Write 764
Mixed 615
230% 1,057 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 43.5
161% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 482
DQ Mixed 683
518% 710 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Seagate One Touch Hub 12TB
10TB free
Firmware: 0064
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 226 215 210 225 229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 244
Write 227
Mixed 153
SusWrite 218
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 1
53% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 8.1
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 0.7
3% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 37%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
85GB free
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 91 95 81 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 233
Write 122
Mixed 177
SusWrite 92
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 36.2
123% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 90.7
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 89
72% 100 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
379GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 96 98 99 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 143
Write 142
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 97.7
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.2% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 20.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 0R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 53% 15 82 17 144 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC10A PHL 240V5
Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $899
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback