Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82MF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82MF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 08:35
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 25.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 255
68% 138 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 648
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 920
57% 920 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 21.6
13% 17.5 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 19.6
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1287 443 239 136 178 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,548
Write 1,534
Mixed 1,302
SusWrite 407
268% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 45.7
153% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,035
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 880
659% 885 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 174%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart Brazil SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG Adata 4JQA-0622AD 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO369F
Typical 82MF Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback