Today's hottest deals

HP 500-326na

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-326na  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '24 at 04:59
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 121
47% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 186
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 10.6
6% 9.17 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 13 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.86% Terrible
Read 10
Write 13.9
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 13.9
10% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 68%
Toshiba HDWT140 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 120 118 122 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 123
Write 99.2
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 119
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 95%
Toshiba HDWT140 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 120 119 122 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 97.8
Write 104
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 119
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
4.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 207 209 205 194 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 199
Write 202
Mixed 144
SusWrite 205
254% 187 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 3.1
253% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 86%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 CT102464BD160B.M16 CT102464BD160B.M16 CT102464BD160B.C16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.2
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 23" 1280 720 GSM59C6 2D FHD LG TV
Typical 500-326na Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-326na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback