Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 11JN002QUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 11JN002QUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 32E4
Memory13.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 59.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 284
83% 160 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 830
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 32E4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.58.06
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 27.9
13% 20 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 20.8
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X113N 512GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51770C30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1521 1684 1701 1482 708 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,339
Write 1,598
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 1242
312% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 28.6
126% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 709
514% 665 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 196%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43BB2-CWE CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FF 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.4% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 24.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.5" 1920 1009 ACR0448 Acer K242HQK
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $118
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback