Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PO9-900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PO9-900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO9-900
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 13:34
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User LUX-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$556
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 228
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 866
78% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,679
104% 1,679 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Sapphire(174B A500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.1% Average
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 169
Parallax 168
5% 114 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 143
Splatting 125
120% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Seagate ZP2000GM 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: R010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1854 1826 1843 1555 1732 1707 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 1,962
Write 2007
Mixed 1,704
SusWrite 1,753
418% 1,856 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 59.7
194% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 659
DQ Write 541
DQ Mixed 596
447% 599 MB/s
Poor: 273%
This bench: 273%
Great: 643%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
350GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 259 253 256 255 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 351
Write 299
Mixed 266
SusWrite 253
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 28.4
103% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 151
147% 226 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73%
Great: 182%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
871GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 192 186 188 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 179
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 188
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$28
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 14.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 24 144 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7709 32GK850G
Typical Predator PO9-900 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $824
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback