Today's hottest deals

Geekom A5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGeekom A5  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 21:35
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 323
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,101
106% 872 Pts
64-Core 1,198
74% 1,198 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 31.3
19% 25.1 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 27
Splatting 20.8
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wodposit NVMe SSD 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2078 2075 2177 2185 2199 1744 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 1,245
Write 2,210
Mixed 1,591
SusWrite 2,076
405% 1,781 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 69
229% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,290
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 1,129
835% 1,109 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 297%
Great: 292%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4S16G32C22ST 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 25.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 27.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7203 SAMSUNG
Typical A5 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Geekom A5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback