Today's hottest deals

Medion Crawler E25

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Crawler E25  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NHxxEx
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210623
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '24 at 21:48
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 57.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 276
80% 154 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 712
74% 593 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Clevo(1558 5E00) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 19.8
10% 14.4 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 18.9
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 542 523 452 510 505 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,031
Write 1,177
Mixed 859
SusWrite 525
202% 898 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 44.7
143% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 632
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 531
370% 474 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 138%
Great: 316%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE084D
Typical Crawler E25 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Medion Crawler E25

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback