Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock A620M-HDV/M.2+  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A620M-HDV/M.2+
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '24 at 07:35
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G-$159
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.55 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 195
2-Core 372
114% 217 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 961
96% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
Asus(1043 86F2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.2% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 112
Parallax 123
93% 116 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 102
Splatting 96.8
91% 113 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,475
Write 1,620
Mixed 1,238
323% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 54.2
191% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 1,167
DQ Mixed 929
768% 1100 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 226%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
29GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 56 55 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.7% Above average
Read 244
Write 103
Mixed 131
SusWrite 89.2
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 20.8
90% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 137
119% 172 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
45GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 90 89 91 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 97.3
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 90.3
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-5600 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
175% Outstanding
MC Read 58
MC Write 71.2
MC Mixed 60.1
180% 63.1 GB/s
SC Read 55.1
SC Write 72.2
SC Mixed 57.5
176% 61.6 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 175%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0936 T22B350
Typical A620M-HDV/M.2+ Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback