LG 17Z90SP-E.ADB9U1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLG 17Z90SP-E.ADB9U1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z90SP
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240223
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 29 '24 at 21:47
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 194
59% 112 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 318
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Device(1854 0530) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5382
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.97% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 17.7
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 0.2
5% 7.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 6.97%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS001TEJ9X101N 1TB
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 397 338 422 449 455 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,998
Write 1,303
Mixed 1,094
SusWrite 406
266% 1,200 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 45.7
136% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 206
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 156%
Great: 531%
HFS001TEJ9X101N 1TB
756GB free
Firmware: 51000A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 394 336 425 471 453 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,524
Write 896
Mixed 1117
SusWrite 409
219% 986 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 40.6
138% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 87.3
76% 118 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 135%
Great: 531%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66BK7BX067 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 8533 MHz clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 27.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.9
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 30 144 17" 1280 720 LGD0793
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback