Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M3504YA
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 31 '24 at 00:35
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 166
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 675
61% 513 Pts
64-Core 1,063
66% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1883) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.46.24
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 30.6
7% 18.9 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 17
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 1112 1141 1220 1210 1213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,321
Write 1284
Mixed 1163
SusWrite 1,180
279% 1,237 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 60.3
208% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 831
629% 849 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 227%
Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 3R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 21% 39 138 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback