Mousecomputer Z170-S01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMousecomputer Z170-S01  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer Z170-S01
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151021
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 03:27
Run Duration462 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 747
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 32.5
29% 31.4 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 32.7
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 406
Mixed 411
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 45.7
171% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 80.1
DQ Mixed 72.4
80% 140 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 3TB
915GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.2% Excellent
Read 153
Write 141
Mixed 144
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.68 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$70
818GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 139
Write 135
Mixed 123
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.18
69% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 113%
Jmicron Generic 3TB
720GB free
Firmware: 9201
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 144
Write 155
Mixed 156
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.21
64% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
608GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 137
Mixed 134
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.18
61% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 114%
Jmicron Generic 3TB
362GB free
Firmware: 9201
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 135
Mixed 121
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.16
63% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
299GB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 64.7
Write 110
Mixed 90.7
67% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.31
76% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
286GB free
Firmware: 8104
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 172
Mixed 152
130% 174 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.21
81% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
211GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 175
Write 135
Mixed 120
107% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.51
4K Mixed 0.29
151% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
69GB free
Firmware: ST1OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 82.9
Mixed 83.1
66% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.38
90% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 60%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 168
Write 158
Mixed 136
195% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
688GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 123
Write 106
Mixed 91.8
133% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 49%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
520GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.5% Good
Read 172
Write 154
Mixed 117
183% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA300 3TB
375GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
Read 123
Write 122
Mixed 85.7
139% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.86
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 1.38 MB/s
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
304GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 94.4
Write 99.1
Mixed 69.9
111% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39%
Great: 43%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
298GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 146
Write 130
Mixed 120
166% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.19
57% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-025.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2040 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 19.8
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-S01 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Mousecomputer Z170-S01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback