Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-24P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-24P  (all builds)
MotherboardMDC Herbag_MDU
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230628
Uptime39.6 Days
Run DateJun 04 '24 at 16:25
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 39
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 109
38% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 255
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1654) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.24.09
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 11.5
2% 8.37 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 520 552 587 595 588 575 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 390
Mixed 403
SusWrite 570
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 29.1
85% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 526
384% 512 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 463%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D8DR-031 WT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 256
16% 256 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0739
Typical Aspire A315-24P Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-24P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback