Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-44  (all builds)
MotherboardBCU Dolphin_BCU
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJun 05 '24 at 08:11
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 60.2
1-Core 89
2-Core 160
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 734
69% 572 Pts
64-Core 1,063
66% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1620) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 29.7
7% 18.8 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 21.6
17% 20.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 256 259 276 282 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 1,270
Write 367
Mixed 440
SusWrite 286
129% 591 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 14.8
94% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 385
DQ Mixed 248
250% 408 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 117%
Great: 274%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 23.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 22.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 14" 1280 720 BOE099B
Typical Swift SF314-44 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SF314-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback