Gigabyte GA-G5 KF5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 12 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KF5  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231103
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateJun 07 '24 at 06:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 46.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 205
66% 125 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 707
65% 545 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 59%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A553) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI 1TB
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMH0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1843 1243 1239 1245 1246 1243 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,458
Write 3,617
Mixed 1,899
SusWrite 1,343
473% 2,079 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 81.4
289% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,018
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 889
654% 866 MB/s
Poor: 268%
This bench: 268%
Great: 379%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 53.6
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 47.2
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical GA-G5 KF5 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KF5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback