Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook 15u G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook 15u G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8079
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '24 at 11:45
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Memory 32
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 114
37% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 95.7
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 92.9
6% 92.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 3.7
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 165 238 206 197 198 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 192
Write 235
Mixed 218
SusWrite 202
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 7.2
34% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 74.3
86% 149 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 125%
Verbatim Vi5000 2TB
569GB free
Firmware: H230610a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 403 687 625 528 575 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 835
Write 721
Mixed 761
SusWrite 576
162% 723 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 23.7
80% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 135
120% 186 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 528%
Philips FM30SS012S/93 SA 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 152 218 194 186 183 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
Read 213
Write 224
Mixed 195
SusWrite 188
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 7
34% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 97.2
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 19.1
38% 76.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 2.1
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 178 32 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO36ED
Typical ZBook 15u G3 Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15u G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback