Today's hottest deals

Fabricado NHJ-W11H-CI53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFabricado NHJ-W11H-CI53  (all builds)
MotherboardFabricado Notebook HQ
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240115
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 15:32
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 177
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 397
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(1E50 8038) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 5.5
5% 5.5 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 9.7
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wodposit NVMe SSD 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1238 1263 634 433 460 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 653
Write 1,191
Mixed 859
SusWrite 738
196% 860 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 31.4
106% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 606
448% 598 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 130%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWD-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 14" 1280 720 IVO057D
Typical NHJ-W11H-CI53 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fabricado NHJ-W11H-CI53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback