Advan 1701

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAdvan 1701  (all builds)
MotherboardADVAN TN21
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230531
Uptime25 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 03:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 40.1
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 141
45% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 261
29% 228 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E50 800D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 8.4
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 6.7
7% 9.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wodposit NVMe SSD 256GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0714C0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 824 901 929 918 965 965 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,168
Write 732
Mixed 704
SusWrite 917
197% 880 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 15.1
105% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 317
236% 313 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 147%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWD-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 9.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 7.2
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 60 14" 1296 800 BOE0A6A
Typical 1701 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Advan 1701

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback