Today's hottest deals

Geekom XT12 Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive417% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGeekom XT12 Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault XT12 Pro
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 19:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 177
2-Core 354
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,019
102% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,572
97% 1,572 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 29.9
20% 28.6 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 11.5
19% 24.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1TB
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFM01.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3982 3914 3869 723 724 723 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 2,079
Write 3,819
Mixed 1,991
SusWrite 2,322
579% 2,553 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 323
4K Mixed 113
413% 167 MB/s
DQ Read 1,761
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 1,502
1,110% 1,477 MB/s
Poor: 244%
This bench: 417%
Great: 417%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 38.4
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 28.4
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23.5" 1280 720 GSM5A4E 24M35
Typical XT12 Pro Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Geekom XT12 Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback