Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN17-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN17-42  (all builds)
MotherboardHWK EX90_HKH
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '24 at 20:21
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 51.9
1-Core 178
2-Core 328
95% 186 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 862
86% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,137
70% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Acer(1025 1733) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.24
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.9% Poor
Lighting 29.3
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 55.5
24% 36.2 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 52.2
33% 38.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HDLU-00BT7 1TB
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXD71W2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1828 1839 1863 1872 2184 2080 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,383
Write 2,226
Mixed 1,999
SusWrite 1,944
481% 2,138 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 63.1
200% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 833
DQ Mixed 943
704% 939 MB/s
Poor: 318%
This bench: 318%
Great: 385%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 37.5
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 26
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 43 165 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1770
Typical Nitro AN17-42 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: Acer Nitro AN17-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback