Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240416
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 19 '24 at 02:31
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 223
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 608
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 844F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.5
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 844F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1518 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 22.7
20% 26.1 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 24.5
21% 26 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fikwot FN955 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13683
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1996 2076 1981 2053 2029 1903 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,310
Write 2,199
Mixed 2,041
SusWrite 2,007
482% 2,139 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 61.2
197% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 603
463% 633 MB/s
Poor: 305%
This bench: 305%
Great: 637%
Kxg60znv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
194GB free
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1552 400 401 400 400 401 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,634
Write 403
Mixed 928
SusWrite 592
196% 889 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 52.3
171% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 726
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 635
480% 646 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 184%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0xD386] 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (83rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 26.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 0 0 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO30EB
Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $258Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback