Today's hottest deals

Thunderobot 911X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive335% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemThunderobot 911X  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT NLXB
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '24 at 11:35
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 71
1-Core 202
2-Core 404
115% 226 Pts
4-Core 780
8-Core 1,244
124% 1012 Pts
64-Core 1,698
105% 1,698 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Quanta(152D 1513) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3688
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 25
Parallax 20.6
15% 21.2 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 0.2
8% 10.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KPEGYMTBW2M512GCJD 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1215288e
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2220 2262 2223 2314 1093 946 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,401
Write 2,396
Mixed 1,575
SusWrite 1,843
462% 2,054 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 72.5
256% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 1,276
DQ Mixed 1,130
838% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 335%
Great: 335%
KPEGYMTBW2M512GCJD 512GB
424GB free
Firmware: 1215288e
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2495 2483 2359 2347 2348 334 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,456
Write 2,558
Mixed 1,650
SusWrite 2,061
491% 2,181 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 73.6
257% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 1,348
DQ Mixed 1,120
841% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 352%
Great: 335%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43CB2-CWE King Tiger KTFGS4AE8 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 34.7
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 25.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 165 15.5" 1707 960 BOE0B40
Typical 911X Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO

System: Thunderobot 911X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback