Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Lite AL15G-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire Lite AL15G-52  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Lite AL15G-52
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240330
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 25 '24 at 19:18
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 177
2-Core 236
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 453
52% 408 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A554) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.73 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison ESO512GHLCA1-E9C 512GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,456
Write 2,441
Mixed 1,671
418% 1,856 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 70.6
232% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 623
DQ Mixed 559
450% 635 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ACPI Digital Co Ltd CMB6-DHDA1BAR08D00 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 18.4
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 212 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 LGD074D
Typical Aspire Lite AL15G-52 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Lite AL15G-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback