Today's hottest deals

AMD A320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAMD A320  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD A320
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '24 at 03:58
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 188
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 589
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 48
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 72.5
39% 59 fps
MRender 54.6
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 41.7
41% 51.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingstonSA400S37/480G 480GB
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1021B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 359 369 362 330 335 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 230
Write 314
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 318
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 0.7
32% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 44.5
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 0.9
49% 110 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 93%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
43GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 8.4 6.3 6.4 6.3 7.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 64.2
Write 23.1
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7
25% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 27
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 5% 73 205 57 60 27" 1280 720 VIE2700 CZ270F165
Typical A320 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: AMD A320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback