Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SFG14-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive485% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFG14-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Coral_RTH
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 20 '24 at 15:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 62.5
1-Core 187
2-Core 360
104% 203 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 946
98% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,229
76% 1,229 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1699) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 16.6
11% 17.6 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17.8
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3583 3559 3520 3350 1032 646 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
485% Outstanding
Read 4,116
Write 3,704
Mixed 2,249
SusWrite 2,615
710% 3,171 MB/s
4K Read 78.7
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 102
358% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 1,017
DQ Mixed 1,072
821% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 242%
This bench: 485%
Great: 485%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
132% Outstanding
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 56.3
MC Mixed 48.7
146% 51.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 23.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 132%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 90 14" 1280 720 SDC4181
Typical Swift SFG14-71 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Acer Swift SFG14-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback