Today's hottest deals

Amazon g5.xlarge

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAmazon g5.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 18:05
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7R32
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 50.6
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 148
52% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 225
26% 203 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A10G
Nvidia(10DE 152F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1710 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 552.74
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 171
Parallax 176
162% 182 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 180
Splatting 131
133% 167 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 142%
Great: 193%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 250GB
155GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 139 141 141 143 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 496
Write 262
Mixed 421
SusWrite 144
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 22.2
68% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 189
140% 188 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 96%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 32GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 178
Write 135
Mixed 152
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 4.8
963% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 32.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 19
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1022 87 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical g5.xlarge Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

System: Amazon g5.xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback