Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1596

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Summit E16 AI Studio A1VETG
MotherboardMSI MS-1596  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240130
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 19:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 38.4
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 103
36% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 586
46% 405 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 1418) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 103
Parallax 116
88% 109 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 83.9
Splatting 78.9
76% 95.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 112%
Intel Arc Graphics X8 (H-iGPU)
MSI(1462 1418) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 55.6
24% 36.6 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 45
Splatting 29.8
28% 34 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HDLU-00BT7 1TB
594GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXD71W2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2107 2310 2077 1848 1656 1782 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,598
Write 2,440
Mixed 2,052
SusWrite 1,964
509% 2,263 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 56.1
181% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 731
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 627
473% 637 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 309%
Great: 449%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66AK6BX070 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 54.3
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 64.7
159% 55.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 16.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 133%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 75 27" 1280 720 XMIB004 Mi 27 NFGL
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback