Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 452%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 589%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics376% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCyberpowerpc GamingPC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z790 GAMING WIFI7
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 19:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$420
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 236
2-Core 470
133% 262 Pts
4-Core 926
8-Core 1,686
157% 1,306 Pts
64-Core 4,020
249% 4,020 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 126%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Asus(1043 88E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
376% Outstanding
Lighting 594
Reflection 581
Parallax 714
484% 630 fps
MRender 531
Gravity 573
Splatting 300
366% 468 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 376%
Great: 402%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 800 GOLD 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1122B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2640 2546 2623 2694 2703 2600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,294
Write 2,653
Mixed 1,651
SusWrite 2,634
521% 2,308 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 52.4
280% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 1,263
DQ Mixed 742
682% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 218%
This bench: 388%
Great: 388%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
185% Outstanding
MC Read 78.2
MC Write 71.3
MC Mixed 70.3
209% 73.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 31.5
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 185%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 3R 6G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 29% 70 214 56 165 27" 1280 720 HPN3673 OMEN 27i IPS
Typical GamingPC Builds (Compare 794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 272%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 356%
UFO

System: Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $999
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback