Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateJul 28 '24 at 07:04
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KS
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 830
74% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$501
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 204
Parallax 243
179% 222 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 198
Splatting 149
157% 199 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 157%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
39GB free
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 117 81 113 106 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 401
Write 287
Mixed 277
SusWrite 130
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 18.1
70% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 44.1
48% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
696GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 132 136 149 147 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 172
Write 174
Mixed 109
SusWrite 137
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 264D 16TB
11TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 166 206 205 197 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 201
Mixed 157
SusWrite 193
255% 188 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 2.4
422% 5.8 MB/s
DQ Read 3
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 1.9
399% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 17.7
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 240 48.8" 1280 720 SAM7053 LC49G95T
Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback