Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive466% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP
MotherboardHP 8B8F
Memory52.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240617
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '24 at 16:34
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel CoreT i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 256
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 650
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8B8F) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5388
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 20.7
15% 20.8 fps
MRender 19.1
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 14.6
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSEIN004TP87MC0 4TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPE23T04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3821 4298 4360 2781 2717 2074 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
466% Outstanding
Read 2423
Write 4,193
Mixed 3,133
SusWrite 3,342
744% 3,273 MB/s
4K Read 80.9
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 120
395% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1069
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 1,013
740% 968 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 466%
Great: 466%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
166% Outstanding
MC Read 66.9
MC Write 66.8
MC Mixed 63.8
188% 65.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 28.8
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 166%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 3R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 8% 87 215 56 60 16" 1536 960 AUO87A8
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback