Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A7 V14.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V14.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V14.2
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '24 at 16:29
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 66
1-Core 175
2-Core 304
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 795
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1179) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3887
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 14.7
10% 15.6 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 25
Splatting 15.9
16% 20 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1656 1950 1650 1970 1305 303 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,095
Write 2,017
Mixed 1,669
SusWrite 1,472
408% 1,813 MB/s
4K Read 80.7
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 105
369% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,532
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,140
908% 1,276 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 347%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 25.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 22.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 17.2" 1920 1017 CMN175C
Typical ABRA A7 V14.2 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Monster ABRA A7 V14.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback