Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HF
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240422
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 21 '24 at 10:22
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-11260H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 286
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 840
86% 694 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 3088) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 9
Parallax 5.3
4% 6.3 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 6.5
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,052
Write 3,424
Mixed 2,383
729% 3,286 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 85.1
323% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,280
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1014
780% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 506%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FT 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 26.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF Builds (Compare 964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback