Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UM5606WA
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 26 '24 at 21:27
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 HX 370
FP8LPDDR5x, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 62.6
1-Core 191
2-Core 352
104% 202 Pts
4-Core 700
8-Core 1,062
109% 881 Pts
64-Core 1,571
97% 1,571 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 890M
Asus(1043 1DF3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.16.04
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 35.9
Parallax 38.6
21% 33.5 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 55.2
34% 39.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 67%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA1T0QFM-1BD1AABGB 1TB
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,507
Write 1,866
Mixed 1406
357% 1,593 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 27.3
121% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 513
346% 429 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 330%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
198% Outstanding
MC Read 74.7
MC Write 75.9
MC Mixed 65.1
205% 71.9 GB/s
SC Read 45.9
SC Write 99.1
SC Mixed 64.2
199% 69.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 198%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 120 16" 1280 720 SDC41AF
Typical ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback