Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '24 at 21:43
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$250
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 205
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 791
73% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 119
Parallax 126
108% 126 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 104
Splatting 89
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV3S1000G 1TB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFK1N.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2050 2108 2088 2093 2096 2104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 1,862
Write 2,152
Mixed 2,000
SusWrite 2090
458% 2,026 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 68.6
221% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 694
504% 663 MB/s
Poor: 300%
This bench: 300%
Great: 553%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 10 10 12 11 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 75.2
Write 47.9
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 9.7
39% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX2666C16D4/4G KHX2666C16D4/4G CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBR2 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 35.6
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 21.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 15 60 21.5" 1920 1009 HKCB215 22N1
Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback