Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 168%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 134%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 216%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 140%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive758% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE  (all builds)
Memory40 GB free of 48 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '24 at 22:04
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KS-$579
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 248
2-Core 496
144% 280 Pts
4-Core 985
8-Core 1,932
173% 1,459 Pts
64-Core 4,309
267% 4,309 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 140%
Great: 141%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A770
Intel(8086 1020) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 32.0.101.5768
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 162
Parallax 243
91% 172 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 196
Splatting 244
191% 233 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 999GB
835GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6165 6626 6527 6625 1658 1302 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
758% Outstanding
Read 6,302
Write 6,540
Mixed 3,288
SusWrite 4,817
1,176% 5237 MB/s
4K Read 78.6
4K Write 272
4K Mixed 108
402% 153 MB/s
DQ Read 2,099
DQ Write 1,892
DQ Mixed 2,024
1,510% 2,005 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 758%
Great: 766%
Nvme CT2000T70 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: PACR5111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2751 2797 2830 2777 2800 2787 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
521% Outstanding
Read 2,800
Write 2,844
Mixed 2386
SusWrite 2,790
610% 2,705 MB/s
4K Read 90.7
4K Write 306
4K Mixed 140
479% 179 MB/s
DQ Read 2,249
DQ Write 1,796
DQ Mixed 1,983
1,495% 2,009 MB/s
Poor: 521%
This bench: 521%
Great: 850%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 150 151 147 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 80.8
Write 129
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 147
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-8200 2x24GB
2 of 2 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 8200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
280% Outstanding
MC Read 116
MC Write 112
MC Mixed 109
321% 112 GB/s
SC Read 35.1
SC Write 54.9
SC Mixed 47.9
131% 46 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 171%
This bench: 280%
Great: 289%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.5" 1280 720 PLN2485 PCT2485
Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 459%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 609%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $2,420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback